OT devices and networks can be deployed anywhere – inside a manufacturing floor, distributed across a chemical processing plant, or out in the arctic monitoring oil and gas pipelines. These OT systems often perform simple yet essential tasks, such as monitoring a valve and shutting it off when a certain value is triggered. As a result, they can perform their tasks with little change for years. Which also means they sometimes run on aging operating systems and obsolete hardware using home grown applications. Since the goal for an OT system is to run exactly as designed, even patches are only applied if they do not hinder the process of the OT system.
But because these OT architectures run on a separate and isolated infrastructure, until recently they have been traditionally isolated from the Internet. One of the reasons for this is because these systems are often tasked with monitoring and managing the highly sensitive processes associated with critical infrastructure. The other is that these systems can be notoriously delicate. Something as benign as an active system scan can cause these devices to fail. And any failure or compromise can have serious if not catastrophic results.
However, new requirements, such as connected power grids, active inventory control, smart environmental control systems, just in time manufacturing, and interactive systems tied to Big Data have begun to change all of that.
In addition, companies are looking for productivity improvements and cost savings by implementing such changes as optimizing plant operations, deploying a more flexible operating environment, or establishing a more proactive inventory control system that requires real time online data. As a result, many of today’s OT systems are transited or tunneled over corporate networks, leverage common internet protocols, run on general-purpose hardware and mainstream operating systems, and are increasingly connected via wireless technologies.
These critical infrastructure systems are also increasingly targeted by cybercriminals, with a reported 51% of critical infrastructure enterprises reporting an OT/SCADA/ICS security breach within the past 12 months.
As a result, Presidential Policy Directive 21 has established a national policy on critical infrastructure security and resilience for the following sixteen sectors:
Chemical, Commercial Facilities, Communications, Critical Manufacturing, Dams, the Defense Industrial Base, Emergency Services, Energy, Financial Services, Food and Agriculture, Government Facilities, Healthcare and Public Health, Information Technology, Transportation Systems, Water and Wastewater Systems, and Nuclear Reactors, Materials, and Waste.
Targeting and taking out a critical infrastructure system has huge appeal for many cybercriminals, especially cyberterrorists or criminal organizations. Motivations include holding systems hostage for a ransom, stock price manipulation (short sell, attack, and reap a “clean” profit), denial of asset or production for strategic or tactical reasons, political awareness or impact, or corporate malfeasance (illegal competitive action).
Unfortunately, not only are many of these now-connected systems quite vulnerable to compromise, unlike IT networks, a failure in one of these sectors also has the possibility of causing a catastrophic event affecting both human life and property. The consequences of a successful attack can lead to the disruption, and even destruction of physical assets and essential services like water, electricity, and fuel.
As the utility, oil and gas, transportation, and manufacturing sectors increasingly adopt connected control systems and Industrial IoT devices, the CI attack surface is rapidly growing. The connected nature of these devices and systems poses serious challenges as they begin to utilize traditionally IT owned network infrastructure, wireless access points, and mobile networks. At the same time, the specialized nature of OT infrastructure technologies means that most IT security and threat intelligence solutions don’t have visibility into, let alone the ability defend against attacks on critical infrastructures.
While securing OT systems requires an integrated approach similar to IT, its objectives are inverted, with availability being the primary requirement, followed by integrity and confidentiality. OT systems are necessarily focused on delivering a particular essential service, such as electricity or water, or maintaining safety systems at chemical plants or dams, and cannot afford to be disrupted even momentarily. Conversely, IT systems are primarily focused on the collection, correlation, and distribution of data, with a primary focus on protecting confidential or personally identifiable information or trade secrets.
Addressing the requirements of an OT network requires an integrated approach comprised of the following elements:
• Segmentation and Encrypted Communications: Perimeter security alone is inadequate. Security needs to be driven deep into the OT infrastructure, segmenting systems and devices, actively monitoring east-west traffic, and isolating compromised devices. In addition, applications and data should be encrypted in order to prevent the injection of malware into that traffic.
• Access Control: Access to OT devices needs to be strictly managed and monitored for devices, users, applications, and protocols.
• Secure Wireless Access: Industrial IoT (IIoT) devices communicate using a wide variety of communications protocols. Securing Wi-Fi connections only solves part of the problem. There are now thousands of vendors building IoT devices using a wide variety of connectivity and communications technologies in addition to Wi-Fi, including Bluetooth, NFC, Zigbee, and RFID. And this doesn’t include IoT devices hardwired into the network behind the firewall. Security resources need to be committed to identifying, segmenting, and securing these connections.
• Vulnerability and Patch Management: With availability as a primary concern for OT networks and devices, patch management has historically not only been overlooked, but actively avoided. Operators may specifically decide not to patch systems that are operational and cannot afford to be taken offline for an update. But as these devices are connected to the IT network and Internet, this approach can no longer remain the status quo. Cybercriminals target known vulnerabilities, so tracking devices and vulnerabilities and implementing an aggressive patch and replace program is essential. For systems that cannot tolerate any down time, it is critical to deploy redundant, active-active devices, alternate data routes, or strict segmentation and active signature and behavioral-based security to protect unpatchable devices.
• Behavioral Analytics and tracking: Advanced threats require more than passive security systems, especially when protecting critical infrastructure. Fortunately, the behavior of most OT systems can be pretty easily defined, which means that unusual or aberrant behavior should be likewise relatively easy to detect and block with a UEBA (user and entity behavior analytics) system in place.
• Ruggedized devices: Traditional OT devices are often required to operate in industrial environments, exposed to extremes in temperature, weather, vibration, and impact. As IT and IoT devices are introduced to this environment, it is critical that organizations select those devices that have been tested and rated to function in extreme settings. The same is true for the security technologies used to protect OT devices and networks.
• Deep Packet Inspection: Malware is increasingly successful at hiding and obfuscating attacks inside applications and data. Given the sensitive nature of industrial control systems (ICS) and the potential for devastating results should they be compromised, it is essential that organizations implement a combination of signature- and protocol/behavioral-based inspection of traffic traveling to, from, and between OT systems to prevent the abuse of particular industrial protocols. Such an approach is also better suited to the OT environments as it can provide protection critical protections without requiring frequent updates.
The transition to hyperconnected networks, such as smart cities and connected utility services, is driving the convergence of IT, OT, and IoT networks. To successfully defend these integrated networks, organizations need an architecture that scales across the entire infrastructure to provide unified visibility and control, distributed segmentation, and integrated protection. Protecting and defending today’s critical infrastructures requires a single, unified approach that integrates security solutions into an interactive Security Fabric capable of adapting to and spanning distributed IT environments, while simultaneously providing the advanced capabilities needed to defend their critical OT infrastructure.
Sr. Vice President, Products and Solutions
John Maddison has more than 20 years of experience in the telecommunications, IT Infrastructure, and security industries. Previously he held positions as general manager data center division and senior vice president core technology at Trend Micro. Before that John was senior director of product management at Lucent Technologies. He has lived and worked in Europe, Asia, and the United States. John graduated with a bachelor of telecommunications engineering degree from Plymouth University, United Kingdom.
Fortinet (NASDAQ: FTNT) secures the largest enterprise, service provider, and government organizations around the world. Fortinet empowers its customers with intelligent, seamless protection across the expanding attack surface and the power to take on ever-increasing performance requirements of the borderless network - today and into the future. Only the Fortinet Security Fabric architecture can deliver security without compromise to address the most critical security challenges, whether in networked, application, cloud or mobile environments. Fortinet ranks #1 in the most security appliances shipped worldwide and more than 330,000 customers trust Fortinet to protect their businesses. Learn more at http://www.fortinet.com, the Fortinet Blog, or FortiGuard Labs.
Copyright © 2017 Fortinet, Inc. All rights reserved. The symbols ® and ™ denote respectively federally registered trademarks and unregistered trademarks of Fortinet, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliates. Fortinet's trademarks include, but are not limited to, the following: Fortinet, FortiGate, FortiGuard, FortiManager, FortiMail, FortiClient, FortiCloud, FortiCare, FortiAnalyzer, FortiReporter, FortiOS, FortiASIC, FortiWiFi, FortiSwitch, FortiVoIP, FortiBIOS, FortiLog, FortiResponse, FortiCarrier, FortiScan, FortiAP, FortiDB, FortiVoice and FortiWeb. Other trademarks belong to their respective owners. Fortinet has not independently verified statements or certifications herein attributed to third parties and Fortinet does not independently endorse such statements. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, nothing herein constitutes a warranty, guarantee, binding specification or other binding commitment by Fortinet, and performance and other specification information herein may be unique to certain environments. This news release contains forward-looking statements that involve uncertainties and assumptions, such as statements regarding technology releases. Changes of circumstances, product release delays, or other risks as stated in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, located at www.sec.gov, may cause results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in this press release. If the uncertainties materialize or the assumptions prove incorrect, results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and assumptions. All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements. Fortinet assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, and expressly disclaims any obligation to update these forward-looking statements.
Oct 20, 2018 0During the Cagayan de Oro City Police Office (Cocpo) 2018 basketball tournament that was held last October 20, the Miss Cocpo 2018 was also conducted. Adjudged winner is Kia Cañete. Here she is being flanked by Cocpo director Senior Supt. Nelson Aganon (right) and Mayor Oscar Moreno (left)....